Skip to main content

More Libertarian: Ron Paul, Rudy Giuliani, Mitt Romney?

As much as libertarians like Ron Paul, his attempt to make non-intervention a libertarian and Constitutional imperative is wrong-minded. Nothing could be easier than to soak into consciousness the anti-war sentiment that prevails in America's psychic atmosphere. Nobody likes war. And there are certainly times when non-intervention is the wisest choice among alternatives. But the deepest libertarian imperative is to put an end to the violation of right.

Rudy Giuliani's position on intervention is much more libertarian and logical than Ron Paul's. Show me who started the violation of right? Show me who was the initiator of murder, rape, torture and plunder? Show me the bad guy ... and I'll put him out of business.

To turn away and do nothing in the face of heinous crimes against humanity is neither libertarian nor in any way satisfying to one's spirit of life, love, joy, and freedom. When Saddam Hussein was toppled, all but the most depraved could not help but feel spontaneously joyous.

Now Mayor Giuliani has declared that government is the problem with U.S. Health Care and only free-markets can offer the solution: Health Care: Giuliani addresses the REAL problem and the REAL solution!

Is Rudy Giuliani far more libertarian than he is given credit for? Are libertarians allowing themselves to be washed along in a peer-pressure tide of anti-war sentiment passing over a great chance to support a winning candidate who favors libertarian solutions?

The libertarian preparation device, A Course in Miracles, discusses the laws of mind:

But the argument that underlies the DEFENSE of freedom is perfectly valid. Because it is true, it should not be FOUGHT for, but it SHOULD be sided WITH. Those who are AGAINST freedom believe that its outcome will hurt THEM, which CANNOT be true. But those who are FOR freedom, even if they are misguided in HOW they defend it, are siding with the one thing in this world which IS true. Whenever anyone can listen fairly to both sides of ANY issue, he WILL make the right decision. This is because he HAS the answer. Conflict can indeed be projected, but it MUST be intrapersonal first.

Available free of charge online:
Course in Political Miracles


Scott Bieser said…
The force initiators, in the case of 9/11, were Dwight Eisenhower (directed the overthrow of Iran's former democratic government and installed a monarchy), Lyndon Johnson, Richard Nixon, Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan (supporting brutal tyrants with money and covert CIA activity, with RMN and JC also giving billions of stolen dollars to the Western colony in the Levant known as Israel), Bush I (directed erstwhile dictator-puppet Saddam Hussein of Iraq to invade Iran, causing a devastating war which killed millions; then turned around and invaded Iraq when it decided to go after an easier target); Bill Clinton (who embargoed and bombed Iraq for years causing the preventable deaths of 600,000 Iraqi children), and Bush II (who continued Clinton's policies up until 9/11).

The 9/11 attacks were a retaliation for five decades of brutish U.S. foreign policy.

Go get 'em.

Il Douche more libertarian than Ron Paul? What a laugh.
Scott, your argument is true in an esoteric kind of way, like arguing that YOU initiated force by chosing to be born.

But your argument doesn't fly with Iraqi victims, or with down-to-earth Americans.

Libertarians will never gain political influence in America by bashing America.

Popular posts from this blog

The Libertarian Way: So Much More Than The NAP!

How often do we hear the word "libertarian" being used in contexts relating to politics or some kind of political understanding? Even most dictionary definitions of "libertarian" emphasize political implications.

Yet libertarians will never experience the full personal benefit of their libertarian impulse, and never be completely successful in any political activism they undertake, unless they understand the Libertarian Way is much deeper and more basic than concern with political conditions.

Before there is politics ... before there are relationships ... there is life. When human beings feel their deepest-rooted inner desires (as opposed to addiction to intellectualism for the purpose of avoiding the depths of their being), they sense inside themselves a yearning for the fullness of life to shine forth and be experienced.

"Fullness" is the key. Liberal-progressive dictators will tell you their programs and agendas help people have a better life, but th…

Lifting Others Up To The Libertarian Way

Probably everyone has experienced moments of the fullness of life: the enthralling love that radiates from our heart when it seems we have met our destined soulmate, the joy that explodes out of our being when at the very last split second our team scores the improbable win of the century, the peace that flows from the depths of our soul when the sunrise suddenly bathes our mountain fishing lake and all seems momentarily "on earth as it is in heaven."

The fullness of life is within us, but doesn't too often emanate from most of us because our minds employ many devices for closing down our being. Yet there is a Way which leads us to constant heart and soul opening and nearly uninterrupted experience of the fullness of life. In common street language this Way is often called "live and let live." Although this encompasses all areas of life, when practiced in the context of people's political interactions it is called The Libertarian Way.

Notice that when we a…

Jesus Christ Does Not Favor Taxation

Heading into midterm election season in America we are faced with an illusory alternative: Caesar in Democratic Party clothing, or in some districts Little Caesar in Republican Party clothing. Apparently what makes the illusion saleable is the mistaken idea (used by Caesar as propaganda) that Jesus Christ was a socialist who supported taxation.

Fascists, communists, and progressives (all three branches of socialism), even after all the misery they have created the world over in the last 100 to 150 years, even now still aim a loud speaker toward us blaring the long broken record of their propaganda mantra: “Jesus was a socialist,” by which they try to convince us that Jesus advocated using government force or threat of force to redistribute wealth.

We’ve addressed the "socialist" issue in the past (See Jesus Christ's Love vs. Obama Style Socialism)

Nonetheless, the illusion could not be sold to the public if it were not for modern conservatives insisting that Jesus supported…