Skip to main content

More Libertarian: Ron Paul, Rudy Giuliani, Mitt Romney?

As much as libertarians like Ron Paul, his attempt to make non-intervention a libertarian and Constitutional imperative is wrong-minded. Nothing could be easier than to soak into consciousness the anti-war sentiment that prevails in America's psychic atmosphere. Nobody likes war. And there are certainly times when non-intervention is the wisest choice among alternatives. But the deepest libertarian imperative is to put an end to the violation of right.

Rudy Giuliani's position on intervention is much more libertarian and logical than Ron Paul's. Show me who started the violation of right? Show me who was the initiator of murder, rape, torture and plunder? Show me the bad guy ... and I'll put him out of business.

To turn away and do nothing in the face of heinous crimes against humanity is neither libertarian nor in any way satisfying to one's spirit of life, love, joy, and freedom. When Saddam Hussein was toppled, all but the most depraved could not help but feel spontaneously joyous.

Now Mayor Giuliani has declared that government is the problem with U.S. Health Care and only free-markets can offer the solution: Health Care: Giuliani addresses the REAL problem and the REAL solution!

Is Rudy Giuliani far more libertarian than he is given credit for? Are libertarians allowing themselves to be washed along in a peer-pressure tide of anti-war sentiment passing over a great chance to support a winning candidate who favors libertarian solutions?

The libertarian preparation device, A Course in Miracles, discusses the laws of mind:

But the argument that underlies the DEFENSE of freedom is perfectly valid. Because it is true, it should not be FOUGHT for, but it SHOULD be sided WITH. Those who are AGAINST freedom believe that its outcome will hurt THEM, which CANNOT be true. But those who are FOR freedom, even if they are misguided in HOW they defend it, are siding with the one thing in this world which IS true. Whenever anyone can listen fairly to both sides of ANY issue, he WILL make the right decision. This is because he HAS the answer. Conflict can indeed be projected, but it MUST be intrapersonal first.

Available free of charge online:
Course in Political Miracles


Scott Bieser said…
The force initiators, in the case of 9/11, were Dwight Eisenhower (directed the overthrow of Iran's former democratic government and installed a monarchy), Lyndon Johnson, Richard Nixon, Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan (supporting brutal tyrants with money and covert CIA activity, with RMN and JC also giving billions of stolen dollars to the Western colony in the Levant known as Israel), Bush I (directed erstwhile dictator-puppet Saddam Hussein of Iraq to invade Iran, causing a devastating war which killed millions; then turned around and invaded Iraq when it decided to go after an easier target); Bill Clinton (who embargoed and bombed Iraq for years causing the preventable deaths of 600,000 Iraqi children), and Bush II (who continued Clinton's policies up until 9/11).

The 9/11 attacks were a retaliation for five decades of brutish U.S. foreign policy.

Go get 'em.

Il Douche more libertarian than Ron Paul? What a laugh.
Scott, your argument is true in an esoteric kind of way, like arguing that YOU initiated force by chosing to be born.

But your argument doesn't fly with Iraqi victims, or with down-to-earth Americans.

Libertarians will never gain political influence in America by bashing America.

Popular posts from this blog

The Winning Tao Of Liberty

One who follows the Liberty Way with people, 
does not use weapons to enforce his will. 
Initiating force always leads to pain and suffering. 

With the Liberty Way where armies once gathered,
briars and brambles now blossom. 

A liberty leader exercises his leadership, 
and that is all. 
If he uses force, it is not to seize for himself. 

He skillfully overcomes liberty's enemies, 
but is not proud. 
His progress might be admired, 
yet he is not boastful. 
His work may even win accolades, 
still he does not brag. He fulfills his purpose for liberty, 
because he knows he has no other choice. 

The Liberty Way is fulfilling one's purpose without using force. 
The above is a liberty interpretation of a passage from the ancient spiritual classic Tao Te Ching.  As in all spiritual works which have been venerated worldwide down through the centuries a difference is recognized between (1) the use of force by ego determination for ego purposes, and (2) the use of force in defense of the freedom to act …

How Liberty Lovers Can Assure Winning

The freedom-loving Libertarian Party has been active 46 years, yet manages to gather only a minuscule percentage of the vote. Many would say this is pathetic.

The Republican Freedom Caucus in the House of Representatives heroically saves America from a disastrous re-application of the ObamaCare premise that dictatorship of people's health insurance is government's business ... a rescue effort for which they should be presenting themselves as national champions. Instead they allow themselves to be portrayed as villains. Maybe not pathetic, but a mixed bag.

It's not that freedom is no longer considered a value among Americans. It's that modern freedom lovers haven't yet learned how to win fully, completely, without limitation. Liberty lovers achieve only partial victories because we do not have a winning mindset.

To achieve complete and lasting victory liberty lovers need to transform their minds and think like winners.

To do this we must first train ourselves to …

The Libertarian Way: So Much More Than The NAP!

How often do we hear the word "libertarian" being used in contexts relating to politics or some kind of political understanding? Even most dictionary definitions of "libertarian" emphasize political implications.

Yet libertarians will never experience the full personal benefit of their libertarian impulse, and never be completely successful in any political activism they undertake, unless they understand the Libertarian Way is much deeper and more basic than concern with political conditions.

Before there is politics ... before there are relationships ... there is life. When human beings feel their deepest-rooted inner desires (as opposed to addiction to intellectualism for the purpose of avoiding the depths of their being), they sense inside themselves a yearning for the fullness of life to shine forth and be experienced.

"Fullness" is the key. Liberal-progressive dictators will tell you their programs and agendas help people have a better life, but th…