Skip to main content

Pro-slavery Barack Obama vs. Abolitionist Ron Paul?



"The real issue is whether America would be a stronger and more prosperous nation if government was reduced to the levels envisioned by the Founding Fathers. America climbed from agricultural poverty to middle-class prosperity before the income tax was adopted, and federal government spending (with the exception of times of war) was a small percentage of GDP." CATO@LIBERTY
(Click to read entire article: Defending Ron Paul's Tax Plan)


The point which the above article misses is that it doesn't matter where savings are going to come from when the income tax is abolished. When you are taxed on your income it is called "slavery," and Ron Paul is the only hugely visible politician calling for the end of slavery in America.

Everybody in the world knows governments are hopelessly inefficient and corrupt, spending far more money than necessary even on what one might think of as legitimate government functions. So do not get caught up wondering where the savings is going to come from when the income tax is abolished. Instead, keep your focus on the immorality of slavery.

The definition of slavery is involuntary subjection to another or others. Lo and behold, the definition of income tax turns out to be involuntary subjection to another or others. Whether you consider the "others" to be politicians, lawyer lobbyists, or simply majority voters, there is nothing voluntary about income tax.

Another definition of slavery is a state of subjugation or captivity often involving burdensome labor. Every paycheck earner in America toils under immense burden, sometimes working two jobs to make ends meet, as his or her earnings are siphoned off by the slave masters' income tax. Families feel obligated to send both parents off to work while kids grow up unsupervised and feeling sometimes unloved, because one parent working does not make enough money once the income tax has been deducted. Don't let anyone tell you income tax is not slavery.

The American Founding Fathers could not complete the American Revolution in the 1700s. The desire of the clearest thinking American revolutionaries was to free men and women from forceful subjugation forever. They were thwarted, but did the best they could at the time. Never in their wildest dreams did they ever imagine people they thought they were freeing would allow themselves to be subjugated by a tax on income.

The income tax became popular later. It was championed by Karl Marx in his "Communist Manifesto," which advocated a society ruled by workers (actually by politicians claiming to be on the side of labor) and paid for by "a heavy progressive or graduated income tax." American intellectuals, hopelessly out of touch with their repressed free spirit, fell for the income tax hook, line, and sinker (almost rhyming with hood-lying-winked).

Ever since Karl Marx's influence took hold we pledge allegiance to the United Slave States of America. Definition of Slave state: a political system paid for in part by slave labor or tax on income.

Yet we have just enough freedom remaining that one politician in America has been able to voice his opposition to the slavery of the income tax and not have his voice totally drowned out. If you love freedom and are not easily hoodwinked by leftists who thrive on the slavery of tax on income ... then register Republican and vote for Ron Paul in your slave state's primary election next year. You might help the Republican Party return to its anti-slavery roots.

(Related Article: Republican Liberty Revolution)


The device which prepares libertarians for success, A Course in Miracles , talks about our ultimate need to free ourselves from every kind of slavery:

You have been told to bring the darkness to the light, and guilt to holiness. And you have also been told that error must be corrected at its source. Therefore, it is the tiny part of your self, the little thought that seems split off and separate, that the Holy Spirit needs. The rest is fully in God's keeping, and needs no guide. But this wild and delusional thought needs help, because, in its delusions, it thinks it is the Son of God, whole and omnipotent, sole ruler of the kingdom it set apart to tyrannize by madness into obedience and slavery.



Available free of charge online:
Course in Political Miracles



Technorati tags:
,
,
, , , , ,
, , , , ,,,, ,

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is Sarah Palin's Joy Ayn Rand's Ideal?

Lesson 50: "I join Ayn Rand, educating spiritually." Government worshippers are in control of most universities, virtually every public school system, and almost every major media market. The general public has been thoroughly brainwashed to believe that if there is a problem, or the illusion of a problem, government solutions are the answer ... a new government program, a new government bureaucracy, more power to government. Because almost all avenues of education and information have been under the control of government worshippers, the vast majority of people are stuck in thinking habits which will never for long periods of time serve liberty. Because people's underlying thinking habits will rise to the surface again and again, any libertarian political victory can only be short-lived ... unless people's underlying way of thinking is changed. As much as I might hate to admit it, thorough re-education of the public cannot not be a number one priority for libertaria...

Ron Paul is Wrong; Mitt Romney is Right!

"Ron Paul does not believe we went into Iraq because of 9/11. But Mitt Romney obviously believes we did. So who’s right?" ~Gary Benoit The strained arguments of some libertarians that Dwight Eisenhower is somehow responsible for the 9/11 attack in New York is equivalent to arguing that President James Buchanan was responsible for the Mountain Meadows Massacre of the Baker-Fancher emigrant party on 9/11 in Utah. It is truth in the sense we are all responsible for everything in our world. This is a very valuable truth, wouldn't you say? The twisted leftist argument is that Islamic Jihadists would not have declared war on Western societies if it hadn't been for Western government policies reaching back through the years. But anyone who studies the Koran knows this argument is bullshit. The Koran demands that war be waged on "infidels" until everyone on earth is either converted to Islam, enslaved by Islamists, or killed. Mitt Romney is right. The United States...

Jesus Christ & Ayn Rand: Brother & Sister

It is far too easy (intellectually lazy) to conclude that Jesus Christ and Ayn Rand are miles apart in what they teach. Nothing is further from the truth. It is only necessary to juxtapose the words of Ayn Rand with the words of Jesus to see they teach exactly the same. Ayn Rand summarizes her teaching this way: "My philosophy, in essence, is the concept of man as a heroic being, with his own happiness as the moral purpose of his life, with productive achievement as his noblest activity, and reason as his only absolute." — Ayn Rand, Appendix to Atlas Shrugged Let's look at the words of Jesus Christ regarding these four elements: 1. heroic being, 2. happiness as purpose, 3. productiveness, and 4. reason as absolute. Let's start with the idea that man must choose to be a heroic being. Here is how Jesus Christ says it: Be not content with littleness, but be sure you understand what littleness is, and why you could never BE content with it. Littleness is the offering you ...