Skip to main content

Do Libertarians Really Want Hellish America?



"Otherwise your purpose is divided, and you will attempt to follow two plans for salvation which are diametrically opposed in all ways. The result can only bring confusion, misery and a deep sense of failure and despair."
~ Jesus Christ


The fundamental issue of the 2008 election is: will Ron Paul Republicans, Constitutionalists, and libertarians go off in separate directions, pursuing separate plans, thus allowing communist-educated Barack Obama to eventually become President of the United States? To read about Obama's close association with a communist guru, click here: Obama's Communist Friend and Guru.

Barack Obama stands for everything freedom-lovers fight against. As a hard-core adherent of Marxist "Liberation Theology," he believes that the masses in a free society suffer from lack, oppression, and injustice. Therefore, for him, society must not be allowed freedom. Government must control. Who will run government? Enlightened Marxists like himself. Will this require more government force than ever? If so, so be it! Sometimes utopian dreams have to be forced on people.

It does not matter that more wars, more death and destruction, more pain and suffering has been caused by Marxist dreamers than all the rest of history. To hell with the facts ... the dream lives on.

Meanwhile, freedom lovers spin their wheels making their petty little arguments about who reminds them too much of George Bush, about supporting third parties, and about writing in names on ballots.

Freedom lovers cannot seem to understand the value of joining together and pulling together for a common purpose, even if it means supporting someone like George Bush.

It would be different if the Democrats did not have Barack Obama on their ticket. Even if the Democrats were running Hillary Clinton and someone else, freedom lovers could afford the luxury of their egoistic "stands on principle." But they will be sorry if they do not unite to defeat a ticket containing Barack Obama.



Available free of charge online:
Course in Political Miracles



Technorati tags:
,
,
, , , , ,
, , , , ,,,, ,

Comments

Unknown said…
What I will do, is vote Libertarian, and register, officially, my desire for small government, non-intervention, free markets, hard money, and the peace and prosperity they would generate.

What I will also do is to remind big-government candidates, whether from the war party or the socialist slavery party that their policies will not work, and why their policies will not work.

Then I will sit back and watch. Whether we get the socialist or the imperialist, their policies will fail. As they do so, I will point out their failures, and explain how the laws of economics predict and explain those failures: whether it is failure of empire failure of socialism.

If enough people do this, and the Libertarians make a credible showing in the coming election, there is a chance ... a chance ... that if the United States is still in good enough shape to have an election in 2112, the people will have been bruised enough by the failures of the kleptocracy to either force one of the big-government parties toward freedom, or to elect a Libertarian candidate.

If, on the other hand, there is an economic collapse before the next election, which is a distinct possibility, I will go to New Hampshire, and hope that there are enough like-minded and well-armed Porcupines there to make a stand, and restore freedom to at least part of America.

I will not relish telling the nation "I told you so". But I will not vote for either perpetual war or for socialism.
It seems a false perception to call one major party a "war party" and one a "slavery party." Democrats have historically led the way into war and slavery both. Republicans historically have spinelessly let it happen. Only recently did Republicans lead the way into war.

No Republican wants war. But Republicans recently seem to have quicker trigger fingers when it comes to responding to perceived threats or potential threats.

Ron Paul believes all is not lost within the Republican Party. Democrats want to lead America into hell, but the Republican Party COULD be used to stop them if the right people work within the Republican Party.

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarian Mantra Exposes Obama Cruelty

President Obama has no choice but to offer you up as a sacrifice to his god.  His worship of the illusion that there can be a "common good" for society which transcends the good of individuals in the society demands your sacrifice. Yet libertarians fiddle. Are you amazed that libertarians blab about marijuana while the economy of the entire world is crashing?  Are you astounded that libertarians nit-pick about bedroom issues while the entire populace is being reduced to slavery?   Many libertarians spend their time forever addressing puny little issues which (a) make them look to the public like petty teenagers, and (b) serve only to side-track the public’s thought from an infinitely more important underlying truth. Okay, let's suppose you want to do some real good for the libertarian cause.  How about addressing  the one and only truly meaningful issue?  Maybe a little story would illustrate what libertarians should be talking about. One upon a time there was a

Ayn Rand and Jesus Christ: Deep Similarities

Ayn Rand's intellectual genius was great, but far greater still was her willingness to tune in to her spirit, feel her spirit, live by her spirit, and write from her spirit. Her spirit has moved millions. "When I studied Atlas Shrugged I was inspired to change the direction of my life totally. I literally owe my life to Ayn Rand." How many times have we heard a statement such as this? The quality in a fictional work which can change someone's life so dramatically is not the intellectualism of the work, but the spiritual foundation on which the intellectualism is built. Intellectualism without a spiritual base is a painful torture which ultimately leads to terror and death, as Ayn Rand so perfectly illustrated with her fictional characters. But intellectualism which arises out of being in touch with one's spirit is a very different story, as those of us know who have read Atlas Shrugged . Ayn Rand's heroes are fond of saying their antagonists are "mindles

Libertarianism Coming On Strong?

"Americans are increasingly opposed to activist government programs. The most significant social movement of 2009, the Tea Party protests, grew out of that opposition. Libertarian heroine Ayn Rand is as popular today as ever. Rand's brilliant and radical laissez faire novel "Atlas Shrugged," sold roughly 300,000 copies last year, according to BookScan, twice its sales in 2008 and roughly triple annual sales in recent decades." - Conservative Libertarianism's Comeback by David Paul Kuhn The above article would have us believe that a growing resurgence in libertarian sentiment is a "backlash" reaction to the Democratic Party's move into full-fledged fascism. Certainly there is some truth to this, but it cannot be the whole story. Franklin Roosevelt's fascism was far more inclusive. FDR's brain trust had almost to a man visited Joseph Stalin in the Soviet Union and liked what they saw . In the Roosevelt Administration there was a