Skip to main content

Speak to Democrats, Bob Barr! They Will Hear Reason!

The Libertarian Party national ticket needs to concentrate on bluish-purple states, not red states.

When Bob Barr, Libertarian Party candidate for President, announced his candidacy in Georgia within this last week he stated, "We can't be everywhere that we want to be right off the bat, so we are going to be hitting those states where we have the greatest likelihood of having as much preliminary impact as possible."

Although it is understandable that any third party candidate might think this way and hope to run up his percentage in political polls, a counter-intuitive approach might be much better for the long term success of libertarian ideas.

In order to understand the counter-intuitive approach, it is necessary to recognize that, like it or not, the grass roots Republican Party (don't think George Bush) is much more an ally to libertarianism than the Democratic Party. Let's put it this way: the Nolan Chart is flawed. It does not differentiate between the dedicated and determined socialistic slavery the Democratic Party would foist on Americans as opposed to the misguided slavery the Republican Party would allow.

Dedicated and determined is far more dangerous than misguided. Dedicated and determined is closed-minded to reality, not even willing to accept proof right in front of open eyes when such proof contradicts preconceived ideas. Misguided is quite a few degrees more open-minded, willing to finally admit mistakes if the proof is obvious.

Said another way: many Republican politicians are fools, but almost all Democrat politicians have sold their souls to Karl Marx. There is a world of difference in underlying motivation.

Yet Bob Barr knows he can get more votes in historically Republican areas, so that's where he plans to campaign.

Political observers challenged Barr: "Your candidacy could put Georgia and other typically Republican states in play for U.S. Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., and help cost U.S. Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., the election." Does anyone remember Bill Clinton in the White House for two terms because Ross Perot ran twice?

Rather than stopping to deeply consider the implications of such a possibility, Bob Barr cavalierly brushed it off: "Anybody that is already predicating a reason for John McCain to be losing and looking for an excuse probably does not have a real good feel for the election," he said. "Or maybe they do; maybe they already anticipate losing. But it's just way too early to be drawing conclusions like that."

Hm.... Sounds like McCain talk, or maybe Obama talk. What ever happened to being honest about what you are doing?

Libertarians derive enormous ego-gratification from considering themselves "spoilers." Every common sense American recognizes the immature teenager-like reaction: "If I can't get what I want, I'll ruin it for someone else ... even if in the process I ruin it for EVERYONE." Taken to it's extreme, this attitude is a death wish ... hardly new for the Libertarian Party.

Let's face it, if Bob Barr makes a good showing in a couple Republican states, it proves nothing and accomplishes nothing. The media would yawn and say, "that's what anyone would have expected." The liberal elite would yawn. The country would yawn. No story. No publicity. No progress.

On the other hand, what would happen if Bob Barr decided to campaign heavily not in historically Republican states but in bluish-purple swing states where Obama has narrow leads in polls?

Causing McCain discomfort is unbecoming petty vindictiveness. Causing Obama to lose his cool and drop his facade in public ... is dynamite!

Is there a state or two where 1% of the vote for Bob Barr could save America from being pushed off the cliff into a deep chasm of socialism, stagflation, and misery under Obama? Is there a state in which Barr could show not only Republicans, but Democrats, the mainstream media, and all other elements of the intellectual elite that libertarians have ideas which are actually power to be reckoned with?

Is there a state where Bob Barr could cause enough grief to liberals to warrant infinitely more coverage by the liberal media than he could ever get in Republican areas? Could Bob Barr pulling construction worker votes in closely contested Ohio, for example, result in the Libertarian Party finally be taken truly seriously?

Think about it. Open your mind to counter-intuitive possibilities ... and allow mental pictures to form which you might have been previously blocking. Maybe you'll get lucky and see the Libertarian Party being lifted higher than ever.

Speaking of "lifting higher", for the last election year we studied (1998) some of the highest percentage of votes for Libertarian Party candidates were for candidates who had been studying free of charge the lessons of: Course in Political Miracles

If you are a freedom lover interested in winning politics be sure to see: Course in Political Miracles

For a great discussion on Christianity vs. State Socialism see: Christianity vs. State Socialism

“I did not understand what made me free, nor what my freedom is, nor where to look to find it. Father, I have searched in vain until I heard Your Voice directing me. Now I would guide myself no more. For I have neither made nor understood the way to find my freedom. But I trust in You. You Who endowed me with my freedom as Your holy Son will not be lost to me. Your Voice directs me." (Prayer from A Course in Miracles)


Popular posts from this blog

The Libertarian Way: So Much More Than The NAP!

How often do we hear the word "libertarian" being used in contexts relating to politics or some kind of political understanding? Even most dictionary definitions of "libertarian" emphasize political implications.

Yet libertarians will never experience the full personal benefit of their libertarian impulse, and never be completely successful in any political activism they undertake, unless they understand the Libertarian Way is much deeper and more basic than concern with political conditions.

Before there is politics ... before there are relationships ... there is life. When human beings feel their deepest-rooted inner desires (as opposed to addiction to intellectualism for the purpose of avoiding the depths of their being), they sense inside themselves a yearning for the fullness of life to shine forth and be experienced.

"Fullness" is the key. Liberal-progressive dictators will tell you their programs and agendas help people have a better life, but th…

Lifting Others Up To The Libertarian Way

Probably everyone has experienced moments of the fullness of life: the enthralling love that radiates from our heart when it seems we have met our destined soulmate, the joy that explodes out of our being when at the very last split second our team scores the improbable win of the century, the peace that flows from the depths of our soul when the sunrise suddenly bathes our mountain fishing lake and all seems momentarily "on earth as it is in heaven."

The fullness of life is within us, but doesn't too often emanate from most of us because our minds employ many devices for closing down our being. Yet there is a Way which leads us to constant heart and soul opening and nearly uninterrupted experience of the fullness of life. In common street language this Way is often called "live and let live." Although this encompasses all areas of life, when practiced in the context of people's political interactions it is called The Libertarian Way.

Notice that when we a…

Jesus Christ Does Not Favor Taxation

Heading into midterm election season in America we are faced with an illusory alternative: Caesar in Democratic Party clothing, or in some districts Little Caesar in Republican Party clothing. Apparently what makes the illusion saleable is the mistaken idea (used by Caesar as propaganda) that Jesus Christ was a socialist who supported taxation.

Fascists, communists, and progressives (all three branches of socialism), even after all the misery they have created the world over in the last 100 to 150 years, even now still aim a loud speaker toward us blaring the long broken record of their propaganda mantra: “Jesus was a socialist,” by which they try to convince us that Jesus advocated using government force or threat of force to redistribute wealth.

We’ve addressed the "socialist" issue in the past (See Jesus Christ's Love vs. Obama Style Socialism)

Nonetheless, the illusion could not be sold to the public if it were not for modern conservatives insisting that Jesus supported…