Skip to main content

Democrat Thugs Would Shout Her Down, But Sarah Palin Brings Freedom



Sarah Palin is everything a free-thinker (libertarian) just has to love.

Sarah Palin pilots a plane, rides a motorcycle, fires an AK-47, wouldn't mind helping Alaska secede from the union, smoked marijuana when young, does not condemn teen pregnancy ... and knows how to run an election and run a government. (See the New Republic's Article: The Case Against the Case Against Palin)

Some libertarians are saying, "Let's elect her and hope John McCain decides he is too tired for the Presidency after all."

Barack Obama's people are teetering on the verge of insanity over Sarah's candidacy. Obama again allowed his monumental arrogance to surface by announcing his own experience far out shadows the experience of a mayor of a town of 9,000 population ... pretending the public is too dumb to know Sarah is governor of a state bordering on foreign countries. Let Sarah debate Obama!

"But Obama knows how to communicate!" Yes, to people whose lifeblood is holding grievances, people who love hearing that America is after all a shit house but somehow a President from a corrupt Chicago political machine can magically make America into a bread and circuses Roman Empire by taxing the bone marrow out of people (don't use the word "slavery").

As the above mentioned article points out, Sarah is really the great communicator with normal people who don't like pain and don't want slavery. If McCain allows Sarah to communicate, Obama becomes a tiny historical footnote. If McCain tries to suppress her communication, Obama becomes President and McCain is forgotten to history.

"But she is so ... uh ... libertarian!"

Well, not enough to satisfy libertarian purists. But have you noticed nothing satisfies purists. One wonders if purists enjoy pain even more than Obama's grievance lovers.

However, Sarah Palin is libertarian enough that we libertarians should want her speaking. We should advise the McCain camp to free her up and not try to muzzle her. We should tell our friends to pass the word: she's worth listening to.

Sarah Palin represents mainstream America. McCain has only the slightest understanding of mainstream America, while Obama lives in clueless socialist dream world. But Sarah knows mainstream America because she lives mainstream America. Sarah's emergence and the media's terrified reaction to her proves that mainstream America is more libertarian than most of us imagine, but has simply not had a voice on the national scene for a long, long time.

Freedom of communication? Let Sarah Palin speak!





Speaking of "lifting higher", for the last election year studied (1998) some of the highest percentage of votes for Libertarian Party candidates were for candidates who had been studying free of charge the lessons of: Course in Political Miracles

For a great discussion on Christianity vs. State Socialism see: Christianity vs. State Socialism



“I did not understand what made me free, nor what my freedom is, nor where to look to find it. Father, I have searched in vain until I heard Your Voice directing me. Now I would guide myself no more. For I have neither made nor understood the way to find my freedom. But I trust in You. You Who endowed me with my freedom as Your holy Son will not be lost to me. Your Voice directs me." (Prayer from A Course in Miracles)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is Sarah Palin's Joy Ayn Rand's Ideal?

Lesson 50: "I join Ayn Rand, educating spiritually." Government worshippers are in control of most universities, virtually every public school system, and almost every major media market. The general public has been thoroughly brainwashed to believe that if there is a problem, or the illusion of a problem, government solutions are the answer ... a new government program, a new government bureaucracy, more power to government. Because almost all avenues of education and information have been under the control of government worshippers, the vast majority of people are stuck in thinking habits which will never for long periods of time serve liberty. Because people's underlying thinking habits will rise to the surface again and again, any libertarian political victory can only be short-lived ... unless people's underlying way of thinking is changed. As much as I might hate to admit it, thorough re-education of the public cannot not be a number one priority for libertaria...
7 comments
Read more

Ron Paul is Wrong; Mitt Romney is Right!

"Ron Paul does not believe we went into Iraq because of 9/11. But Mitt Romney obviously believes we did. So who’s right?" ~Gary Benoit The strained arguments of some libertarians that Dwight Eisenhower is somehow responsible for the 9/11 attack in New York is equivalent to arguing that President James Buchanan was responsible for the Mountain Meadows Massacre of the Baker-Fancher emigrant party on 9/11 in Utah. It is truth in the sense we are all responsible for everything in our world. This is a very valuable truth, wouldn't you say? The twisted leftist argument is that Islamic Jihadists would not have declared war on Western societies if it hadn't been for Western government policies reaching back through the years. But anyone who studies the Koran knows this argument is bullshit. The Koran demands that war be waged on "infidels" until everyone on earth is either converted to Islam, enslaved by Islamists, or killed. Mitt Romney is right. The United States...
10 comments
Read more

Libertarian Success Assured

If the world were free of socialists, "progressives," "do-gooders," and other would-be dictators, libertarians (like most people ... hint, hint) would have no interest in entering politics. But in a world addicted to using government force in misguided attempts to "help people," many libertarians recognize the need to engage in politics for the purpose of self-defense, to keep the bad guys as well as the so-called good guys (well-meaning "do gooders") from legislating a slavery-burden of rules. regulations, decrees, taxes, wealth distribution, and other ego-vested insanity. "But you have to have some government!" A few libertarians claim the only government needed is individual self-government. They would change their minds quickly if they lived among unchecked roving brute force gangs. Governments evolve naturally for good reason. Unfortunately, the Democratic Party in America, like socialist parties in other countries, has itself be...
5 comments
Read more