Skip to main content

Libertarian Death Wish

Once upon a time there were three little sheep. But not really … because it is always misleading to judge by surface appearances, and these were political “sheep” wanting to be leader of the flock.

One of our little “sheep” was really a wolf in sheep’s clothing. His intent was to enslave the flock and make them all beholden to him, begging for their life. His plan was to redistribute the grazing wealth in such a way as to provide all sheep with just enough life to assure an ongoing food supply for himself and his allied wolves who had also infiltrated the flock. Because he wasn’t really a sheep himself, he had found it necessary to hone skills in the art of disguise, trickery, and demagoguery. His supporters wished to call him “Der Fuhrer,” but he preferred to be known as “Eloquent.” He had become a master of appearing honorable while deceiving, therefore he could figure on the support of about 45% of the flock.

The second of our three little sheep was in a way a “black sheep” in that his tendency at every turn to say “Naaahhh!” instead of “Baaahhh” to the wolves’ policies seemed fairly radical. He actually believed the flock would experience a much fuller life if every aspect of their lives was not regulated by a powerful leader and a powerful leader’s cohorts. “Love’woolution!” was his campaign slogan. Relying on truth and logic, he did not attempt to cultivate charismatic speaking skills or create a “looks like a leader” persona. Even though he was known by the generally unappealing nickname of “Naaahhh,” he did enjoy the ardent support of maybe 3-4% of the flock.

The third little sheep was a master consensus builder for problem solving, and presented himself as a thoughtful and strong leader who cared deeply about the flock. But he did seem sometimes to push a seeming solution at the cost of losing consistency of principle. This tendency, along and his willingness to keep his mind open to change, made him sometimes appear not firm of conviction. Many called him by the name “Flipper,” even though about 44% of the flock felt he would make a decent enough leader.

As anyone can see from the numbers, if the supporters of Flipper and Naaahhh worked together their combined support would defeat the wolf as well as the hideous agenda of the wolves.

But the plot thickens. Unbeknown to themselves, the supporters of Naaahhh had a secret subconscious death wish. On one level, they knew that their principles, their purposes, even their lives, would be the first to go if the wolf continued to gain successes. Which means they knew on some level that refusing to support Flipper amounted to supporting the wolf, thus selling out their principles and their lives. But because of their death wish, they began to spread amongst themselves the exact opposite idea: the twisted thought that the act of joining with the Flipper supporters to defeat the wolf would be selling out their principles. They began championing the idea that Flipper would be not just an imperfect leader, but would be the same as the wolf. Most justified the psychic influence of their death wish by stating the obvious: “Supporting the lesser of two evils only gives you a lesser evil.” They ignored the fact that a lesser evil allows a greater good to survive. Others began to ignore reality altogether and say, “Flipper as leader would be the same as the wolf leader … exactly the same.”

You know the end of the story. Death wishes lead to death. The supporters of Naaahhh refused to support Flipper. The wolf and his allies became stronger than ever. The wolf’s henchwolves systematically destroyed everything the Naaahhh supporters stood for. The wolves knew who their worst enemies were, and those sheep who supported Naaahhh were the first to be sheared, skinned alive, and eaten. It wasn’t long before Naaahhh’s ideas and principles disappeared from the general flock dialogue.

Some would say this is not an unhappy story because “give me liberty or give me death” is a cool sounding idea to the ego, and besides there is a prophecy which claims Naaahhh’s ideas and principles became hidden in the genes of many generations of sheep, but will someday resurface at the end of times. Nonetheless a few ancient sheep to old for even the wolves to eat still remember the words of The Battle Hymn of the Crucified Shepherd: “As He died to make sheep holy, let us LIVE to make sheep free!”



To understand the evil psychology of modern "liberal progressives," read Ayn Rand's "Atlas Shrugged"




"God's laws will keep your minds at peace, because peace IS His Will, and His laws are established to uphold it. His are the laws of freedom, but yours are the laws of bondage. Since freedom and bondage are irreconcilable, their laws CANNOT BE UNDERSTOOD TOGETHER. The laws of God work only for your good, and there ARE no other laws beside His. Everything else is merely lawLESS, and therefore chaotic." -Jesus Christ in A Course in Miracles


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is Sarah Palin's Joy Ayn Rand's Ideal?

Lesson 50: "I join Ayn Rand, educating spiritually." Government worshippers are in control of most universities, virtually every public school system, and almost every major media market. The general public has been thoroughly brainwashed to believe that if there is a problem, or the illusion of a problem, government solutions are the answer ... a new government program, a new government bureaucracy, more power to government. Because almost all avenues of education and information have been under the control of government worshippers, the vast majority of people are stuck in thinking habits which will never for long periods of time serve liberty. Because people's underlying thinking habits will rise to the surface again and again, any libertarian political victory can only be short-lived ... unless people's underlying way of thinking is changed. As much as I might hate to admit it, thorough re-education of the public cannot not be a number one priority for libertaria...

Ron Paul is Wrong; Mitt Romney is Right!

"Ron Paul does not believe we went into Iraq because of 9/11. But Mitt Romney obviously believes we did. So who’s right?" ~Gary Benoit The strained arguments of some libertarians that Dwight Eisenhower is somehow responsible for the 9/11 attack in New York is equivalent to arguing that President James Buchanan was responsible for the Mountain Meadows Massacre of the Baker-Fancher emigrant party on 9/11 in Utah. It is truth in the sense we are all responsible for everything in our world. This is a very valuable truth, wouldn't you say? The twisted leftist argument is that Islamic Jihadists would not have declared war on Western societies if it hadn't been for Western government policies reaching back through the years. But anyone who studies the Koran knows this argument is bullshit. The Koran demands that war be waged on "infidels" until everyone on earth is either converted to Islam, enslaved by Islamists, or killed. Mitt Romney is right. The United States...

Jesus Christ & Ayn Rand: Brother & Sister

It is far too easy (intellectually lazy) to conclude that Jesus Christ and Ayn Rand are miles apart in what they teach. Nothing is further from the truth. It is only necessary to juxtapose the words of Ayn Rand with the words of Jesus to see they teach exactly the same. Ayn Rand summarizes her teaching this way: "My philosophy, in essence, is the concept of man as a heroic being, with his own happiness as the moral purpose of his life, with productive achievement as his noblest activity, and reason as his only absolute." — Ayn Rand, Appendix to Atlas Shrugged Let's look at the words of Jesus Christ regarding these four elements: 1. heroic being, 2. happiness as purpose, 3. productiveness, and 4. reason as absolute. Let's start with the idea that man must choose to be a heroic being. Here is how Jesus Christ says it: Be not content with littleness, but be sure you understand what littleness is, and why you could never BE content with it. Littleness is the offering you ...