Skip to main content

Does Ron Paul Candidacy Open Libertarian Minds?


What is the real definition of "libertarian?"

Congressman Ron Paul's campaign to become the Republican nominee for U.S. President has attracted substantial interest in libertarianism while at the same time causing many libertarians to look outside of their mental boxes and either: 1) question Paul's adherence to libertarian principles, 2) question the value of the Libertarian Party who are thought of in many minds as "losers," or 3) question the standard shaky and hard-to-defend definition of libertarianism.

Regarding Ron Paul's libertarian litmus test, it seems that when someone else is willing to step forward and run for president on a major party ticket and gather significant media attention and spur an interest in researching libertarianism in thousands of new people, then we can have a comparison debate.

As to the value of the Libertarian Party....

But maybe it is time for a better definition of libertarianism. The current definition, which relies on hazy and arguable conceptions of force or threat of force is a definition based on fear. "I fear that I'm going to be forced...." But true libertarianism has nothing whatsoever to do with fear.

Men and women have fought for freedom throughout mankind's history, but not until recently have they tried to confuse the issue with definitions having to do with the misuse of force. One fights for liberty for one reason only: one's spirit is free and needs to remain free.

The wrong left-turn which many libertarians took into atheism has caused many to forget why they really want freedom. We are spiritual beings who deep inside ourselves want and need freedom to follow our spirit. We are also human beings who teach ourselves by trial and error, so we want and need freedom to make mistakes and learn from our mistakes.

A proper definition of libertarianism would be based on love. "We love our spirit and we love the spirit of others. If we don't have liberty, we are spiritually dead!"

The libertarian preparation device, A Course in Miracles, speaks of the spirit of freedom:

And thus their freedom is established and maintained. It is upheld through all temptations to imprison and to be imprisoned. It is them, who learned of freedom, that you should ask what freedom is. Ask not the sparrow how the eagle soars, for those with little wings have not accepted for themselves the power to share with you.




Available free of charge online:
Course in Political Miracles

Comments

Unknown said…
I am not sure why you think so many Libertarians became atheist.

The party may have, because it allowed atheists a refuge from other political parties. Also many Libertarian atheists are more likely aptheists (they don't even believe in asking the question if there's a God or god).

"If your arrangement doesn't bother you, then I guess it doesn't bother me"- Wyatt Earp from the movie Wyatt Earp

Popular posts from this blog

Is Sarah Palin's Joy Ayn Rand's Ideal?

Lesson 50: "I join Ayn Rand, educating spiritually." Government worshippers are in control of most universities, virtually every public school system, and almost every major media market. The general public has been thoroughly brainwashed to believe that if there is a problem, or the illusion of a problem, government solutions are the answer ... a new government program, a new government bureaucracy, more power to government. Because almost all avenues of education and information have been under the control of government worshippers, the vast majority of people are stuck in thinking habits which will never for long periods of time serve liberty. Because people's underlying thinking habits will rise to the surface again and again, any libertarian political victory can only be short-lived ... unless people's underlying way of thinking is changed. As much as I might hate to admit it, thorough re-education of the public cannot not be a number one priority for libertaria...

Ron Paul is Wrong; Mitt Romney is Right!

"Ron Paul does not believe we went into Iraq because of 9/11. But Mitt Romney obviously believes we did. So who’s right?" ~Gary Benoit The strained arguments of some libertarians that Dwight Eisenhower is somehow responsible for the 9/11 attack in New York is equivalent to arguing that President James Buchanan was responsible for the Mountain Meadows Massacre of the Baker-Fancher emigrant party on 9/11 in Utah. It is truth in the sense we are all responsible for everything in our world. This is a very valuable truth, wouldn't you say? The twisted leftist argument is that Islamic Jihadists would not have declared war on Western societies if it hadn't been for Western government policies reaching back through the years. But anyone who studies the Koran knows this argument is bullshit. The Koran demands that war be waged on "infidels" until everyone on earth is either converted to Islam, enslaved by Islamists, or killed. Mitt Romney is right. The United States...

Jesus Christ & Ayn Rand: Brother & Sister

It is far too easy (intellectually lazy) to conclude that Jesus Christ and Ayn Rand are miles apart in what they teach. Nothing is further from the truth. It is only necessary to juxtapose the words of Ayn Rand with the words of Jesus to see they teach exactly the same. Ayn Rand summarizes her teaching this way: "My philosophy, in essence, is the concept of man as a heroic being, with his own happiness as the moral purpose of his life, with productive achievement as his noblest activity, and reason as his only absolute." — Ayn Rand, Appendix to Atlas Shrugged Let's look at the words of Jesus Christ regarding these four elements: 1. heroic being, 2. happiness as purpose, 3. productiveness, and 4. reason as absolute. Let's start with the idea that man must choose to be a heroic being. Here is how Jesus Christ says it: Be not content with littleness, but be sure you understand what littleness is, and why you could never BE content with it. Littleness is the offering you ...