What's wrong with the picture painted by the above video?

Usually when there is a common enemy, people have enough common sense to lay aside their differences and ban together to defeat the common enemy, right?

Normally when the common enemy is extremely powerful and there are potential dire consequences if the enemy were to gain complete control, people are wise enough hold their peace regarding their pet issues while working with allies on issues that bottom line are infinitely more important, wouldn't you say?

The question is: are libertarians capable of the kind of common sense and wisdom most people innately turn to?

If fascist socialist Democratic Party thugs are going to be stopped from destroying the spirit of America (and the world), libertarians are going to have to learn to work with Republicans who agree with some of their main premises while not yet "on board" in every respect, true or false?

Rather than go into Republican meetings and blasting off on pet libertarian themes, libertarians are going to have to focus on areas of agreement and keep quiet for a while (until the common enemy is defeated) when it comes to areas of disagreement, true or false?

Over time fascist socialists have taken over the Democratic Party. They didn't do so by going into Democratic Party meetings years ago and spouting the hardest to accept fascist socialist ideas.

Quite the opposite. They joined the Democratic Party and worked for Democratic Party candidates of all stripes ... thus earning their "Democrat" credentials and the respect of other Democrats. They gave the appearance of being Democrats, not fascist socialists. They paid their dues working within their Party until they could finally rise to the top and take control.

There is no reason why libertarians cannot take over the Republican Party, but they are going to have to pay their dues by getting along with other Republicans and working their way to the top, wouldn't you say?

In the real world you don't win success by insisting only you are right all the time. In the real world you don't gain supporters by judging everyone who disagrees with you as unworthy of your comradeship. The question is: are you a libertarian who is grown up enough to play in the real world?



If you are just waking up to your innate libertarian side and want to investigate deeper the underlying nonsense of Obama's religion of government worship, give yourself the pleasure of reading Ayn Rand's epic and masterful novel, Atlas Shrugged



"God's laws will keep your minds at peace, because peace IS His Will, and His laws are established to uphold it. His are the laws of freedom, but yours are the laws of bondage. Since freedom and bondage are irreconcilable, their laws CANNOT BE UNDERSTOOD TOGETHER. The laws of God work only for your good, and there ARE no other laws beside His. Everything else is merely lawLESS, and therefore chaotic." -Jesus Christ in A Course in Miracles


For the last election year studied (1998) some of the highest percentage of votes for Libertarian Party candidates were for candidates who had been studying free of charge the lessons of: Course in Political Miracles

For a great discussion on Christianity vs. State Socialism see: Christianity vs. State Socialism



“I did not understand what made me free, nor what my freedom is, nor where to look to find it. Father, I have searched in vain until I heard Your Voice directing me. Now I would guide myself no more. For I have neither made nor understood the way to find my freedom. But I trust in You. You Who endowed me with my freedom as Your holy Son will not be lost to me. Your Voice directs me." (Prayer from A Course in Miracles)

1 comments
  1. Anonymous January 16, 2010 at 12:07 AM  

    I wish not concur on it. I think nice post. Especially the title-deed attracted me to review the sound story.